Thrombosis and bleeding after COVID-19 vaccination: do differences in sex matter?

Gender medicine deals with differences in approach to diagnostic work-up and management according to gender. Although the issue is relevant in every field of medicine, it is often neglected. However, the recent SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has made consideration of gender even more urgent. In fact, available literature has suggested a higher number of deaths among infected men than in women and more side effects in women than in male recipients of certain anti-COVID-19 vaccines. This review examines sex-disaggregated data on thrombotic and bleeding events associated with vaccination against COVID-19. Thrombotic complications are by far more frequently reported than bleeding events after vaccination and are mostly observed in young women receiving viral-vectored vaccines. However, detailed data that could help better stratify the risk according to sex/gender are generally lacking. Likewise, overall bleeding complications and those associated with a specific vaccine are mainly reported as aggregated data, including thrombocytopenia that is reported to occur in the presence or absence of thrombotic complications. Such information is important as it underlines the need to differentiate between thrombocytopenia with and without thrombosis because management and prognosis differ according to the association of thrombotic events. Here, we highlight how the lack of disaggregated data has led to the publication of conflicting information about adverse events by sex in recipients of viral-vectored vaccines. Lastly, we examine the possible mechanisms underlying vaccine-associated thrombotic and bleeding complications according to sex/gender.

Assessing QT interval in COVID-19 patients:safety of hydroxychloroquine-azithromycin combination regimen.

BACKGROUND: Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and azithromycin (AZT) have been proposed for COVID-19 treatment. Data available in the literature reported a potential increased risk of fatal arrhythmias under these therapies. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of these drugs on QT interval and outcome in a COVID-19 population. METHOD: A total of 112 consecutive COVID-19 patients were included in this analysis and were divided in 3 groups according to the receiving therapeutic regimens: 19 (17%) patients in Group 1 (no treatment), 40 (36%) in Group 2 (HCQ only), 53 (47%) in Group 3 (HCQ/AZT). RESULTS: A prolonged QTc interval was found in 61% of patients treated with HCQ alone or in combination with AZT, but only 4 (4%) patients showed a QTc > 500 ms. HCQ/AZT combination determined a greater increase of QTc duration compared to the other two strategies (Group 3 452 ± 26.4 vs Group 2 436.3 ± 28.4 vs Group 1 424.4 ± 24.3 ms, respectively; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that HCQ/AZT combination (OR 9.02, p = 0.001) and older age (OR 1.04, p = 0.031) were independent predictors of QTc prolongation. The risk increased with age (incremental utility analysis p = 0.02). Twenty patients (18%) died, and no cardiac arrest neither arrhythmic fatalities were documented. CONCLUSIONS: The HCQ/AZT combination therapy causes a significantly increase of QT interval compared to HCQ alone. Older patients under such regimen are at higher risk of experiencing QT prolongation. The use of such drugs may be considered as safe relating to arrhythmic risk in the treatment of COVID-19 patients as no arrhythmic fatalities occurred.

Clinical Course of COVID-19 Infection in Patients Urgently Operated of Cardiac Surgical Procedures.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe the clinical course of a consecutive series of patients operated of urgent cardiac surgery during COVID-19 outbreak. BACKGROUND: In Italy, COVID outbreak has mostly occurred in the metropolitan area of Milan, and in the surrounding region of Lombardy, and previously "conventional" hospitals were converted into COVID spokes to increase ICU beds availability, and to allow only urgent CS procedures. METHODS: Among urgent CS patients (left main stenosis with unstable angina, acute endocarditis, valvular regurgitation with impending heart failure), 10 patients (mean age = 57 ± 9 years), despite a negative admission triage, developed COVID-pneumonia postoperatively, at a median of 7 days after CS. RESULTS: Patients showed typical lymphopenia, higher prothrombotic profile, and higher markers of inflammation (ferritin and interleukin-6 values). At the zenith of pulmonary distress, patients presented with severe hypoxia (median PaO2/FIO2 ratio = 116), requiring advanced noninvasive ventilation (Venturi mask and continuous positive airway pressure) in the majority of cases. All patients were treated with hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, and low-molecular-weight heparin at anticoagulant dose. Overall in-hospital mortality was 10% (1/10), peaking 25% in patients who developed COVID pneumonia immediately after CS. The remaining patients, with late infection, were all discharged home without oxygen support, at a median of 25 days after symptom onset. CONCLUSIONS: As postoperative mortality in case of COVID pneumonia is not negligible, meticulous rules (precise triage, safe hospital path, high level of protection for health-care teams, prompt diagnosis of suspicious symptoms) should be strictly followed in patients undergoing CS during COVID pandemic. The role of therapies alternative to CS should be further assessed.